jev-phishing-bench
anisselbd
The signal result above was challenged on three points: no non-AI baseline, selection and evaluation on the same emails, and no equivalent decomposition for the LLM. Three controls were added (`bench/heuristics.py`, `bench/protocol.py`, `run_llm_signals.py`); nothing above was changed. Full tables in `results/report.md`, chart in `results/controls.png`.
- License
- Not declared
- GitHub Stars
- 2
- Source reviewed
- —
Where Jev makes a decision
Jev returns a structured decision for the local program; consult the source for the exact decision policy.
What this project offers
Adds structured choices or scores to the workflow; performance and cost benefits have not been independently verified.
Review scope
Based on repository metadata and README with rule-based classification; pending human review, with no independent runtime or performance verification.
Sources and implementation
Related projects
safer-with-jev
andrelandgraf · Security & Guardrails
An HTTP inspection gateway that checks request content with Jev before optionally forwarding it to an HTTPS destination.
pi-jev
y0usaf · Security & Guardrails
A Pi extension that flags tool risks before execution and checks output for secrets and failure types.
pi-jev-auto-mode
jomatsu · Security & Guardrails
Adds rule checks to Pi commands and file operations, then uses Jev to assess cases that need further judgment.
jev-judgment
HyunjunJeon · Security & Guardrails
Adds judgment checks for authorization, operation risk, and failure causes to coding Agents.